Skip to content
Rutland Counts — Rutland, in numbers.Local help →
Rutland Counts / Langham

Langham · Rutland

Langham: your neighbourhood

Langham electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

People aged 65 or over: 33.9% here, compared with 25.3% across Rutland (8.6 percentage points higher).

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented privately: 9% here, compared with 17% across Rutland (7.3 percentage points lower).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented from a council or housing association: 5% here, compared with 11% across Rutland (6.3 percentage points lower).

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

33.9%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

475 out of 1,403.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

4.4%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

61 out of 1,401.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

1,400

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

1,400 out of 1,400.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

40.3%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

488 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

44%

21 March 2021 · Langham

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

281 out of 638.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

10.2%

21 March 2021 · Langham

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

65 out of 638.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

46.5%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

563 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

52.1%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

631 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

1.2%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

15 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

15.2%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

184 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

9%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

60 out of 635.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

38%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

460 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

5%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

29 out of 635.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

1.5%

21 March 2021 · Langham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

18 out of 1,212.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Langham ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

38 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 49 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Langham ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 5 mapped crimes in September 2024; 2 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Langham
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 202450
October 202460
November 202421
December 202441
January 202571
February 202550
March 202521
April 202510
May 202532
June 202530
July 202580
August 202532
September 202510
October 202570
November 202541
December 202520
January 202640
February 202630
March 202680
April 202640
May 202610
June 202621
July 202602
August 202620
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Langham
CategoryMapped crimes
violent crime13
other theft6
public order6
burglary4
criminal damage arson4
vehicle crime2
theft from the person1
drugs1
other crime1
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Rutland →